SMSF Mandatory Reading

10 Jan 2019

Written by

David Busoli, Principal

SMSF Adviser published an article by Deanne Firth of Tactical Super that I feel should be retained to provide to SMSF trustees who complain about having to justify their related party transactions.

Essentially, a member drew loans, in multiple tranches over three years, totalling $90,000. Each tranche incurred an administrative penalty resulting in a total penalty of $616,200. These are strict liability offences so the ATO does not have to prove anything except that they happened.

Significantly, the penalty amount would have been $2,464,000 if the fund had not had a corporate trustee.

After negotiation, the ATO reduced the penalty to $109,000 to be paid by the directors of the corporate trustee personally. In addition the whole of the $90,000 was added to the member’s assessable income in a single year and taxed personally at their marginal rate.

There are a few lessons here. Obviously trustees should be aware of their obligations but, failing this,

  • a daily SMSF administration service would have picked up the problem after the first tranche
  • the damage would have been reduced if the accounts had been lodged earlier – thus illustrating the reason why the 3 year audit proposal is crazy
  • a corporate trustee should be mandatory for all SMSFs

The full article is available here.

Keeping you up-to-date with what you need to know about SMSFs. Subscribe to get our updates delivered straight to your inbox.

More SMSF News

Best of Both Worlds

Access to relevant information and efficient time usage are two of a planner’s greatest challenges. Our SMSF...

read more